Home
Shanna's Journal
Shanna's Adventures in Publishing (and in life)
Book Report: I Can't Think of a Theme 
30th-Oct-2007 01:43 pm
Books
I haven't done a book report in a while, mostly because I've been obsessively reading Terry Pratchett lately, and I'm pretty much the last to the game there, so there's not much point in reporting on those books, and most of the other books I've read I haven't really liked enough to want to recommend them to others.

But I do have a new release to talk about. Alan Dean Foster's latest Pip and Flinx adventure, Patrimony, comes out today, and I've already read it. In fact, I read it weeks ago. Remember how stressed I was about getting copy edits later than I was expecting, but still having them due on the same date, and that happening to come in the week when I had a convention, jury duty and the Browncoat Ball -- and yet I still got them done in time? Well, I guilted my editor into snagging an advance copy for me as a reward for generally being awesome.

I've been reading this series since I was about nine years old, and now it's winding down (I believe the next book will be the last) and finally answering some of the big questions. I'd describe it as being almost like a science fiction Harry Potter. It's about an orphan with a mysterious (even to him) past and some uncanny abilities he doesn't quite understand. He also has an empathic flying snake as a pet (I don't even like snakes, but I love Pip). The series takes him from the age of about 15 until now when he's in his 20s, and it's mostly about the adventures he has along the way while he tries to track down information on his birth, and especially an explanation for what's going on in his head. Alan's (yes, I'm now on a first-name basis) strength is world building, as he creates some very cool ecosystems and inhabitants on each world Flinx visits. This book's world strikes me as being likely based on Alaska, which was fun to read, as my parents went there in August. Flinx finally has some information on who his father might be, and this information is so important to him that he considers it worth a detour on his mission to stop the Great Void that may swallow the whole galaxy. It's a good adventure yarn in a harsh alien setting, with a few plot twists that are fun for long-term readers of the series. Now I can't wait for the next book, and I hope I can still find some strings to pull to get an early copy.

Then for something entirely different, I found Myths, Lies and Downright Stupidity by John Stossel on the New in Non-Fiction shelf at the library. Stossel,a correspondent for 20/20, takes a look at a lot of conventional wisdom, those ideas that are commonly accepted as true -- and especially reported by the media as fact. He looks at things like whether getting cold and wet will give you a cold (false), whether banning DDT saved lives (actually, millions in malaria-stricken areas have died because of the ban), and all those jokes about women drivers (women are statistically much safer drivers than men). Some of it is amusing, but the chapters on public education and lawsuits are rather chilling. He's pretty good at backing up his conclusions with data, but even if you disagree with the conclusions he's drawn from that data, I think that at least reconsidering the things that you think are true is good exercise for the brain. There's also some interesting consumer advice, like tests for purity and blind taste tests of tap water vs. bottled water (you can save a lot of money), taste tests for premium coffee brands (really expensive gourmet coffee tends to score low in blind tests) and how to shop to best take advantage of warehouse clubs (they're not always a money saver if you aren't careful). It's all written in a very conversational, entertaining style and was a pretty quick read.

I also re-read Stardust by Neil Gaiman, and this may be quasi-blasphemy, but I think I like the way the story played out better in the movie. I still love the book, and the writing is gorgeous, but the movie added so many clever little touches that I kind of missed when I re-read the book.

Now I'm back to Terry Pratchett, so it may be a while before I have another book report.
Comments 
30th-Oct-2007 09:19 pm (UTC) - reading/writing
Anonymous
Just a suggestion from your most ardent fan, less reading for pleasure and more writing for my enjoyment (of course there are many other fans out there that silently agree with me). I am so ready for the next part. Mom
31st-Oct-2007 06:29 pm (UTC) - Re: reading/writing
I'm working! Really!
30th-Oct-2007 09:40 pm (UTC)
Woo, finally, somebody that agrees with me on the Stardust novel! This makes me very happy ^_^
Then again, I think it was turned into a novel from a comic book/graphic novel, and the movie was generally awesome. But still...woo!
30th-Oct-2007 09:57 pm (UTC)
Neil Gaiman was heavily involved in Stardust-the-movie, so it's not really blasphemous.

And while I feel that Stardust-the-movie had a weaker start than Stardust-the-book, I liked the movie's ending better.

Though the part in the book where they went off having adventures for a few years before settling down was pretty good.
31st-Oct-2007 06:30 pm (UTC)
I loved the idea of going off on adventures before settling down, but I could see how that wouldn't work so well in a movie. However, I did like how in the movie the father and mother were able to end up together, and the very end of the movie leaves me with a tear in my eye.
31st-Oct-2007 01:20 am (UTC) - Not quite on-topic
I've been hanging around your agent's blog, lately, and recently found some old posts that enticed me to look you up, and now after reading all excerpts from your Enchanted, Inc series that I can find between your site's links and my local library online catalog (so I now can't remember why, precisely, I looked you up to begin with), those books are definitely added to my "to read" list when I get some free time.

And now I find that you also like Terry Pratchett! I've only read Reaper Man, Going Postal, and Thud!, but I certainly want to read more. But that liking seems to explain your books' tone.

What I find a bit amusing is before I'd heard of your existence, I'd thought of a somewhat similar story idea (in that a central aspect is comparable to your magic immunity, though mine's not quite the same). You have no idea how heartening it is to me to know that there are quirky fantasies out there to be found. (It's fun when you find someone whose eyes bulge momentarily when you mention your plot line for something, isn't it? Of course, then they usually avoid you…)

Also, I'll testify that girls who don't "get" such things as George Clooney and designer… stuff… do exist, if you ever need it! ;-)

Okay, so this is basically a thinks-she'll-be-a-fan kid who in her still-fresh finder's enthusiasm wanted to come say "Hi" before the urge faded. Now she's said it, and she'll shut up, now.

-Misti
31st-Oct-2007 06:32 pm (UTC) - Re: Not quite on-topic
Hi, and welcome!

I didn't discover Terry Pratchett until about a year ago when I found Going Postal -- in spite of the fact that my friends had been talking about him for years. And now I have tons and tons of books to catch up on, so I can binge and still not have to wait years for the next book. Wheeeee!
31st-Oct-2007 02:40 pm (UTC)
I liked a lot of what they did in Stardust the movie, but what I really loved was that it kept the same *tone* as the book, but made it a better fit for the screen. In the book it was all right for the climax to sort of fizzle--which wouldn't have worked at all on screen. So, love for both versions of Stardust on this end, and one of these days I'll pick up the original illustrated version. (I think it was always prose + images rather than sequential art.)

Also... I hate the usage of "myths" as equivalent to "lies," which I'm sure doesn't say anything about the book you read, but does undermine the value of myth in an academic or writerly context as we dilute it in our vocabularies. *sigh*

Speaking of... would you be interested in writing a guest blog post for my blog regarding the importance of myth in _________ (fill in the blank). In your case, I'd love to have you write a bit about using fairy tales in fiction, based on your work in Katie's world--or myth and archetypes in fiction, both of which I think you're uniquely qualified to write about. But if you'd like to do it, the topic is really up to you. :) No deadline as yet; I have some theorhetically coming in this November, but I'm hoping to compile a bunch before posting any of them, so I can have it be a regular once-a-week spot, around 250 to 500 words long. Let me know!
31st-Oct-2007 06:35 pm (UTC)
He didn't really equate "myth" to "lie." The way he phrases it in the book's introduction is:
"Researching consumer stories, I discovered that much of what I thought to be true was nonsense. On the other hand, "myth" doesn't necessarily mean "false" -- it can also mean "a popular belief or tradition." Occasionaly, just as we were ready to shovel the nonsense away, a myth would turn out to be true. Usually, however, the shovel dug up lies and stupidity."

So there were cases where he listed a myth, then said it was true and gave the data to support it.

I'd love to do a guest post. I just need to finish the current book before I even pretend to write anything else.
31st-Oct-2007 06:59 pm (UTC)
What comfort! I'm glad that a lot of myths ended up being true. :) (It's funny that his title caught me, but I love MythBusters...)

I would love to have you guest blog *whenever* you have time, so have fun finishing the book. It's been exciting to read your process on these revisions/rewrites, by the way. I hope it turns out to be an animal you love by the time you're finished!
2nd-Nov-2007 01:02 am (UTC) - Delurking to say
Anonymous
whether banning DDT saved lives (actually, millions in malaria-stricken areas have died because of the ban),

Shanna, this is completely false. 10 seconds on Google will demonstrate how completely this has been debunked. (see e.g. http://timlambert.org/category/science/ddt/) It is dangerous.

- Kathleen
2nd-Nov-2007 03:27 am (UTC) - Re: Delurking to say
I don't know, 10 seconds on Google found a number of articles backing up that claim, with comprehensive citations, and some even from sources like the WHO. DDT was badly misused and overused, and that was bad, but proper use in malaria stricken areas could have great benefit.

Try this:
http://www.who.int/malaria/docs/FAQonDDT.pdf

and this:
http://www.junkscience.com/ddtfaq.html

I don't actually have a strong opinion in the matter, but the whole "DDT is evil!" thing is one of those things that is so often presented as an accepted fact, but the more I look at it, the less the actual science, as opposed to the hype, doesn't seem to back it up, and that makes me think it needs to be explored and questioned rather than falling back on established kneejerk reactions.

This page was loaded Jul 15th 2009, 10:38 pm GMT.